Comments on: Can I See Your Working, Please? http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/07/can-i-see-your-working-please.html Experiments and Thoughts on Quackery, Health Beliefs and Pseudoscience Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Ari http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/07/can-i-see-your-working-please.html#comment-4853 Ari Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:36:00 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/07/can-i-see-your-working-please.html#comment-4853 it's all part of the ongoing conspiracy by the producers of synthetic fibers to suppres the production of natural cannabis fibers. they will use every possible fear to achieve their goals, including our fear of rats.<br/><br/>Ari<br/><a HREF="http://www.canaseed.com" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Cannabis Seeds</a> it’s all part of the ongoing conspiracy by the producers of synthetic fibers to suppres the production of natural cannabis fibers. they will use every possible fear to achieve their goals, including our fear of rats.

Ari
Cannabis Seeds

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/07/can-i-see-your-working-please.html#comment-4717 Anonymous Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:01:00 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/07/can-i-see-your-working-please.html#comment-4717 Whenever someone tries to tell me that cannabis leads to hard drugs, I point out that although many heroin addicts have tried cannabis, all heroin addicts have consumed milk early in their lives.<br/><br/>Should we ban milk? Whenever someone tries to tell me that cannabis leads to hard drugs, I point out that although many heroin addicts have tried cannabis, all heroin addicts have consumed milk early in their lives.

Should we ban milk?

]]> By: Alexis de Tokeville http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/07/can-i-see-your-working-please.html#comment-4681 Alexis de Tokeville Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:14:00 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/07/can-i-see-your-working-please.html#comment-4681 Hey, I opened my new blog with acomment on the same article!<br/><br/>The diabolical liberty taken by its authors shows that this is "science" of the worst sort, puppets paid for by a Prohibitionist agenda.<br/><br/>I have read the report, it's available on the Net. I quote from p.7 :-<br/><b>"The periodic exposure to low-dose THC during adolescence did not appear to predispose animals to an increased sensitivity to initiate heroin self-administration."</b><br/><br/>That fairly clearly shows that cannabis is NOT a gateway drug, no? So how is it that the oppsite conclusion is drawn and trumpetted?<br/><br/>Ms Hurd is a disgrace to herself and her profession. Hey, I opened my new blog with acomment on the same article!

The diabolical liberty taken by its authors shows that this is “science” of the worst sort, puppets paid for by a Prohibitionist agenda.

I have read the report, it’s available on the Net. I quote from p.7 :-
“The periodic exposure to low-dose THC during adolescence did not appear to predispose animals to an increased sensitivity to initiate heroin self-administration.”

That fairly clearly shows that cannabis is NOT a gateway drug, no? So how is it that the oppsite conclusion is drawn and trumpetted?

Ms Hurd is a disgrace to herself and her profession.

]]>