<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Once Dismissed as Hokum&#8230;&quot; A Guide to Writing About Quackery in the Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/10/once-dismissed-as-hokum-guide-to.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/10/once-dismissed-as-hokum-guide-to.html</link>
	<description>Experiments and Thoughts on Quackery, Health Beliefs and Pseudoscience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henri H</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/10/once-dismissed-as-hokum-guide-to.html#comment-16774</link>
		<dc:creator>Henri H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/10/once-dismissed-as-hokum-a-guide-to-writing-about-quackery-in-the-mail.html#comment-16774</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

your comments look very appealing BUT just because we, human beings, are unable to proof something yet does not mean that you have proven that it does not exist or it does not work! right? Science is great But also VERY limited to the point that they can only talk about things that they can proof.....think outside the box and be amazed at what you might discover. Is it real or fake? It all depends on how you look at it and your own (inner) limiting beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>your comments look very appealing BUT just because we, human beings, are unable to proof something yet does not mean that you have proven that it does not exist or it does not work! right? Science is great But also VERY limited to the point that they can only talk about things that they can proof&#8230;..think outside the box and be amazed at what you might discover. Is it real or fake? It all depends on how you look at it and your own (inner) limiting beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CORE Physicians Group of Highland &#124; Lennyanndomingo&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/10/once-dismissed-as-hokum-guide-to.html#comment-12718</link>
		<dc:creator>CORE Physicians Group of Highland &#124; Lennyanndomingo&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/10/once-dismissed-as-hokum-a-guide-to-writing-about-quackery-in-the-mail.html#comment-12718</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Once Dismissed as Hokum&#8230;&#8221; A Guide to Writing About Quackery in &#8230; &#8211; &#8220;Once Dismissed as Hokum&#8221; is how Dr Danny Penman begins with a less-than-half-truth in his quacktasticly exceptional article about Spiritual Healing in the Daily Mail, &#8220;Could spiritual healing actually work?&#8221; This article ought to serve &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Once Dismissed as Hokum&#8230;&#8221; A Guide to Writing About Quackery in &#8230; &#8211; &#8220;Once Dismissed as Hokum&#8221; is how Dr Danny Penman begins with a less-than-half-truth in his quacktasticly exceptional article about Spiritual Healing in the Daily Mail, &#8220;Could spiritual healing actually work?&#8221; This article ought to serve &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

