<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quack Word #16: &#8216;Nutritionist&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html</link>
	<description>Experiments and Thoughts on Quackery, Health Beliefs and Pseudoscience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-12427</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-12427</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who pays your bills that you are so vehemently against this movement to get back to natural farming practices?&quot;


This is one of the core arguments of the Organic Movement: &quot;Study after study which I don&#039;t care to cite have proven my philosophy, while any idea or notion to the contrary is funded by the Corporate Boogeyman.&quot;

Not too dissimilar to the arguments used by Animal Rights activists, purveyors of New Age bunk, and even far-Left activist types.

Organic food&#039;s biggest selling point is it&#039;s politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who pays your bills that you are so vehemently against this movement to get back to natural farming practices?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is one of the core arguments of the Organic Movement: &#8220;Study after study which I don&#8217;t care to cite have proven my philosophy, while any idea or notion to the contrary is funded by the Corporate Boogeyman.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not too dissimilar to the arguments used by Animal Rights activists, purveyors of New Age bunk, and even far-Left activist types.</p>
<p>Organic food&#8217;s biggest selling point is it&#8217;s politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locke</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-12171</link>
		<dc:creator>Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-12171</guid>
		<description>My mum, unfortunately, is so gullible she obeys every word these &quot;nutriquacks&quot; say. She takes too many vitamins, she has completely cut out all wheat, soy, and dairy from her diet, and she looks very yellow.

I call her nutritionist &quot;Dr. Ducky&quot;, because he&#039;s a quack and he waddles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mum, unfortunately, is so gullible she obeys every word these &#8220;nutriquacks&#8221; say. She takes too many vitamins, she has completely cut out all wheat, soy, and dairy from her diet, and she looks very yellow.</p>
<p>I call her nutritionist &#8220;Dr. Ducky&#8221;, because he&#8217;s a quack and he waddles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lol</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-11048</link>
		<dc:creator>Lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-11048</guid>
		<description>Swampy, define the &quot;right places&quot;. I can&#039;t believe a person can be so selectively gullible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swampy, define the &#8220;right places&#8221;. I can&#8217;t believe a person can be so selectively gullible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Canard Noir</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-6255</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Canard Noir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-6255</guid>
		<description>Study after study? Name three - and make sure they were not written by vitamin and mineral salespeople.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;e.g. see &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/04/mineral-depleted-food-scandal.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Study after study? Name three &#8211; and make sure they were not written by vitamin and mineral salespeople.</p>
<p>e.g. see <a HREF="http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/04/mineral-depleted-food-scandal.html" REL="nofollow" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swampy77</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-6254</link>
		<dc:creator>Swampy77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2006/11/quack-word-16-nutritionist.html#comment-6254</guid>
		<description>While I agree with your comments that more people call themselves nutritionists than should, I disagree with your assertion that the listed statements are quackery, especially the one that organic food is not better. Scientific study after study has demonstrated just the opposite, that commercial agriculture strips veggies of much of their vitamin and mineral content and that people are unhealthier for it. Who pays your bills that you are so vehemently against this movement to get back to natural farming practices? The evidence is there. I suggest you look in the right places next time for your answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with your comments that more people call themselves nutritionists than should, I disagree with your assertion that the listed statements are quackery, especially the one that organic food is not better. Scientific study after study has demonstrated just the opposite, that commercial agriculture strips veggies of much of their vitamin and mineral content and that people are unhealthier for it. Who pays your bills that you are so vehemently against this movement to get back to natural farming practices? The evidence is there. I suggest you look in the right places next time for your answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

