Could you please provide a little more info/text/abstract? Dr. Havas’ science has clearly impressed you and I’m sure you’d like us to benefit from what you learned from it.

How many people know wi-fi operates at a brainwave frequency and therefore interferes with cells’ ability to communicate with one another causing chaos to proteins, neural pathways etc? Do people know routers are 3 times more powerful than mobile phone masts?

The Council of Europe has just reiterated the need for member states to recognise and help electrosensitives. This is not big brother stuff; thank god there is an impartial body not susceptible to the corruption of mobile phone companies who are undoubtedly making billions from government licences and who are all too aware of the health risks. Why otherwise are more than 60% of them not covered by insurance companies against health claims?

I guarantee that everyone claiming this would not be able to tell if a power source is on or off any better than the ‘energy healers’ exposed by Emily Rosa could feel her energy – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Rosa

Which is to say, no better than guessing

I am also very suspicious of 'Russian Experiments'. If we cannot get access to translated versions of the papers then we really cannot discuss them. All we are doing is discussing second hand hearsay about them – and there has been lots of misrepresentation in this field.

You are right though about drop outs in some studies – this is a concern. But it is also not evidence that there is an effet. Remember, plausibility counts against the hypothesis that EM has direct health implications. We are still short of any good data or science to suggest that this is real.

If they are exposed again, their symptoms return, even if they are not aware of exposure.

Sometimes it may take a cumulative effect of EMF exposure to give a response in a controlled experiment, or the response be delayed according to internal homeostatic balance. One cannot just sit a person down with a mobile phone and expect them to react immediately, they may become ill hrs or days after the exposure, unrecorded. Thus the results may be biased. From what I understand one of the major studies cited, the Essex study, a number of individuals most sensitive, had to be removed from the experiment as they became too ill. This would have biased the eventual results, removing subjects from the experimental group that showed potentially the greatest effects.

In Russian studies they have used much longer term exposure to RF and microwave frequencies, and shown much more profound bioeffects at very much lower exposure limits. Long term exposure appears to eventually push the body's capacity to adapt to the stress of microwaves over a threshhold . The sensitivity then becomes apparent. This has been shown in Russian experiments. Western experiments have generally been too short term.

I suffer from ES, and I’ve proven it with a gaussmeter. Turn in your cell phone and buy a gaussmeter instead and prove it to yourself f you are sick! And then get tested for Lyme and coinfections, too, because the two work hand-in-hand – artificial electromagnetic fields CAUSING my chronic Lyme!