<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles Darwin and Homeopathy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html</link>
	<description>Experiments and Thoughts on Quackery, Health Beliefs and Pseudoscience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:52:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mojo</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-9362</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-9362</guid>
		<description>&#039;Anonymous&#039; seems to have taken note of your comment: after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jan/31/homeopathic-remedies-nhs?showallcomments=true#CommentKey:81a2ec8d-8028-466e-a980-1a35250cde06&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;making the same claim&lt;/a&gt; on the &lt;i&gt;Guardian&lt;/i&gt; website, they &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jan/31/homeopathic-remedies-nhs?showallcomments=true#CommentKey:e880791d-9427-4562-a59b-39db6d460f73&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;modified their claim&lt;/a&gt; to include 12C remedies.  Of course, that result would contradict Darwin&#039;s account of the experiments - he found that there was a level below which Drosera did not react.  In fact, I suspect that the original 6C claim might contradict Darwin&#039;s account: a homeopath&#039;s website they later cited claims that the dilutions Darwin used were &quot;equivalent to a 7th homeopathic decimal dilution&quot;.  Note, &quot;decimal&quot; and not &quot;centesimal&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#39;Anonymous&#39; seems to have taken note of your comment: after <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jan/31/homeopathic-remedies-nhs?showallcomments=true#CommentKey:81a2ec8d-8028-466e-a980-1a35250cde06" rel="nofollow">making the same claim</a> on the <i>Guardian</i> website, they <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jan/31/homeopathic-remedies-nhs?showallcomments=true#CommentKey:e880791d-9427-4562-a59b-39db6d460f73" rel="nofollow">modified their claim</a> to include 12C remedies.  Of course, that result would contradict Darwin&#39;s account of the experiments &#8211; he found that there was a level below which Drosera did not react.  In fact, I suspect that the original 6C claim might contradict Darwin&#39;s account: a homeopath&#39;s website they later cited claims that the dilutions Darwin used were &quot;equivalent to a 7th homeopathic decimal dilution&quot;.  Note, &quot;decimal&quot; and not &quot;centesimal&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Canard Noir</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-9208</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Canard Noir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-9208</guid>
		<description>Of course, the outcome of such an experiment has absolutely nothing to say about homeopathy - only the sensitivity of sundews to very dilute solutions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do the same experiment with a 12C or even a 30C and then you are talking. Are you a homeopath brave &#039;Anonymous&#039;? Do you not undertand the issues here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the outcome of such an experiment has absolutely nothing to say about homeopathy &#8211; only the sensitivity of sundews to very dilute solutions.</p>
<p>Do the same experiment with a 12C or even a 30C and then you are talking. Are you a homeopath brave &#39;Anonymous&#39;? Do you not undertand the issues here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-9207</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-9207</guid>
		<description>Why dont you conduct the simple test like Darwin did:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. go to a garden centre and buy a sundew plant (drosera rotundiflora). It has to be fresh.&lt;br /&gt;2. Buy a bottle of liquid ammonium carbonicum 6C (that is one in hundred six times).&lt;br /&gt;3. Drop some tap water on the leaves of the plant and wait - nothing will happen.&lt;br /&gt;4. Drop a few drops of the﻿ ammounium carb. 6C on the same leaves and wait - the same leaves will react and close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dont you conduct the simple test like Darwin did:</p>
<p>1. go to a garden centre and buy a sundew plant (drosera rotundiflora). It has to be fresh.<br />2. Buy a bottle of liquid ammonium carbonicum 6C (that is one in hundred six times).<br />3. Drop some tap water on the leaves of the plant and wait &#8211; nothing will happen.<br />4. Drop a few drops of the﻿ ammounium carb. 6C on the same leaves and wait &#8211; the same leaves will react and close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6218</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6218</guid>
		<description>Here is a description of &quot;the water cure&quot; from a book called &quot;Recreations of a Country Parson&quot; ...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And the change of life is total. You may have finished your bottle of port daily for twenty years, but at the Water Cure you must perforce practice total abstinence. For years you may never have tasted fair water, but here you will get nothing else to drink, and you will have to dispose of your seven or eight tumblers a day. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You may have been accustomed to loll in bed of a morning till nine or ten o’clock; but here you must imitate those who would thrive, and ‘rise at five:’ while the exertion is compensated by your having to bundle off to your chamber at 9.30 p.M. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You may long at breakfast for your hot tea, and if a Scotchman, for your grouse pie or devilled kidneys; but you will be obliged to make up with the simpler refreshment of bread and milk, with the accompaniment of stewed Normandy pippins. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You may have been wont to spend your days in a fever of business, in a breathless hurry and worry of engagements to be met and matters to be seen to; but after a week under the Water Cure, you will find yourself stretched listlessly upon grassy banks in the summer noon, or sauntering all day beneath the horse-chestnuts of Sudbrook, with a mind as free from business cares as if you were numbered among Tennyson’s lotus-eaters, or the denizens of Thomson’s Castle of Indolence. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And with God’s blessing upon the pure element He has given us in such abundance, you will shortly (testibus Mr. Lane and Sir E. B. Lytton) experience other changes as complete, and more agreeable. You will find that the appetite which no dainty could tempt, now discovers in the simplest fare a relish unknown since childhood. You will find the broken rest and the troubled dreams which for years have made the midnight watches terrible, exchanged for the long refreshful sleep that makes one mouthful of the night. You will find the gloom and depression and anxiety which were growing your habitual temper, succeeded by a lightness of heart and buoyancy of spirit which you cannot account for, but which you thankfully enjoy.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;*********&lt;br/&gt;Sounds delightful - we now pay thousands of dollars a week for places like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a description of &#8220;the water cure&#8221; from a book called &#8220;Recreations of a Country Parson&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>And the change of life is total. You may have finished your bottle of port daily for twenty years, but at the Water Cure you must perforce practice total abstinence. For years you may never have tasted fair water, but here you will get nothing else to drink, and you will have to dispose of your seven or eight tumblers a day. </p>
<p>You may have been accustomed to loll in bed of a morning till nine or ten o’clock; but here you must imitate those who would thrive, and ‘rise at five:’ while the exertion is compensated by your having to bundle off to your chamber at 9.30 p.M. </p>
<p>You may long at breakfast for your hot tea, and if a Scotchman, for your grouse pie or devilled kidneys; but you will be obliged to make up with the simpler refreshment of bread and milk, with the accompaniment of stewed Normandy pippins. </p>
<p>You may have been wont to spend your days in a fever of business, in a breathless hurry and worry of engagements to be met and matters to be seen to; but after a week under the Water Cure, you will find yourself stretched listlessly upon grassy banks in the summer noon, or sauntering all day beneath the horse-chestnuts of Sudbrook, with a mind as free from business cares as if you were numbered among Tennyson’s lotus-eaters, or the denizens of Thomson’s Castle of Indolence. </p>
<p>And with God’s blessing upon the pure element He has given us in such abundance, you will shortly (testibus Mr. Lane and Sir E. B. Lytton) experience other changes as complete, and more agreeable. You will find that the appetite which no dainty could tempt, now discovers in the simplest fare a relish unknown since childhood. You will find the broken rest and the troubled dreams which for years have made the midnight watches terrible, exchanged for the long refreshful sleep that makes one mouthful of the night. You will find the gloom and depression and anxiety which were growing your habitual temper, succeeded by a lightness of heart and buoyancy of spirit which you cannot account for, but which you thankfully enjoy.</p>
<p>*********<br />Sounds delightful &#8211; we now pay thousands of dollars a week for places like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Canard Noir</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6124</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Canard Noir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6124</guid>
		<description>As I said earlier, posts not relevent to the discussion of Charles Darwin and homeopathy will be deleted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said earlier, posts not relevent to the discussion of Charles Darwin and homeopathy will be deleted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Canard Noir</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6122</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Canard Noir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6122</guid>
		<description>I am sick to death of homeopaths trotting out the same old canards after the stupidity of their claims have been pointed out a thousand times.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#039;treating individuals&#039; is homeopathic rhetoric. What does it mean? If I am an individual with malaria, I would like my malaria to disappear please. Call it treating me as an individual or a disease, i do not care. Just make sure I do not die.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And that is the point about trials. DBRCTs make absolutely no assumptions about the nature of the treatment or the nature of the measured outcomes, whether it is based on the &#039;individual&#039; or a more objective measure of the presence of, say, malarial parasites, or even death. It is perfectly possible to test homeopathy with trials. Say what you want to achieve (e.g. reduce death)and then measure it in a blinded fashion. Its that simple. Why do you now get it?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My feeling is that you do get it but you are a dissembler, Antony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sick to death of homeopaths trotting out the same old canards after the stupidity of their claims have been pointed out a thousand times.</p>
<p>&#8216;treating individuals&#8217; is homeopathic rhetoric. What does it mean? If I am an individual with malaria, I would like my malaria to disappear please. Call it treating me as an individual or a disease, i do not care. Just make sure I do not die.</p>
<p>And that is the point about trials. DBRCTs make absolutely no assumptions about the nature of the treatment or the nature of the measured outcomes, whether it is based on the &#8216;individual&#8217; or a more objective measure of the presence of, say, malarial parasites, or even death. It is perfectly possible to test homeopathy with trials. Say what you want to achieve (e.g. reduce death)and then measure it in a blinded fashion. Its that simple. Why do you now get it?</p>
<p>My feeling is that you do get it but you are a dissembler, Antony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6120</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6120</guid>
		<description>Regarding Shang et al you don&#039;t get it do you. Homeopaths treat individuals not disease states so of course the trials set according to the toxic pill pushing methodology is going to produce innacurate results. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyway this is funny. If you check the BMJ website below you&#039;ll see only 13% of NHS treatments is rated as beneficial. A horrendous statistic.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; By the way Darwin was still a eugenicist who&#039;s own offspring suffered the consequences. If he was such a genius why did he experiment by procreating with his own family members, a fact well known in those days to produce delinquents, still births and allopaths. ;-)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/about/knowledge.jsp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Shang et al you don&#8217;t get it do you. Homeopaths treat individuals not disease states so of course the trials set according to the toxic pill pushing methodology is going to produce innacurate results. </p>
<p>Anyway this is funny. If you check the BMJ website below you&#8217;ll see only 13% of NHS treatments is rated as beneficial. A horrendous statistic.</p>
<p> By the way Darwin was still a eugenicist who&#8217;s own offspring suffered the consequences. If he was such a genius why did he experiment by procreating with his own family members, a fact well known in those days to produce delinquents, still births and allopaths. <img src='http://www.quackometer.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/about/knowledge.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/about/knowledge.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Canard Noir</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6116</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Canard Noir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6116</guid>
		<description>New documents are now available online and a biography by Darwin&#039;s son includes the mention,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;Besides the holidays which I have mentioned there were his visits to the water cure. He began in 1849 when very ill suffering from constant sickness. He was urged to try to water cure by Fox (or Sulivan) and at last agreed to try Dr. Gully&#039;s establishment.1 — His letters to Fox show how much good the treatment did him: I fancy he thought that he found a cure for his troubles, which but like all other remedies it had only a transient effect on him. However he found it at first so good for him that he built himself a douche when he came home, &amp; Parslow learned to be his bathman. He thought Dr. Gully a clever Dr but I do not think he liked him. He was repelled by all the homeopathy &amp; spiritualism that Dr Gully favoured. — He so far humoured Dr G. as to allow himself to be examined by a medical clairvoyante. who This person who localized the mischief in the stomach, in doing so he followed as my father believed some unconscious hints from Gully or his assistant.&quot; It was I think to this clairvoyante to whom my father offered a £5 note if she could tell him the number. She scornfully refused demean herself in such a way...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&amp;itemID=CUL-DAR140.3.1--159&amp;pageseq=88</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New documents are now available online and a biography by Darwin&#8217;s son includes the mention,</p>
<p><i>Besides the holidays which I have mentioned there were his visits to the water cure. He began in 1849 when very ill suffering from constant sickness. He was urged to try to water cure by Fox (or Sulivan) and at last agreed to try Dr. Gully&#8217;s establishment.1 — His letters to Fox show how much good the treatment did him: I fancy he thought that he found a cure for his troubles, which but like all other remedies it had only a transient effect on him. However he found it at first so good for him that he built himself a douche when he came home, &#038; Parslow learned to be his bathman. He thought Dr. Gully a clever Dr but I do not think he liked him. He was repelled by all the homeopathy &#038; spiritualism that Dr Gully favoured. — He so far humoured Dr G. as to allow himself to be examined by a medical clairvoyante. who This person who localized the mischief in the stomach, in doing so he followed as my father believed some unconscious hints from Gully or his assistant.&#8221; It was I think to this clairvoyante to whom my father offered a £5 note if she could tell him the number. She scornfully refused demean herself in such a way&#8230;</i></p>
<p><a href="http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&#038;itemID=CUL-DAR140.3.1--159&#038;pageseq=88" rel="nofollow">http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=side&#038;itemID=CUL-DAR140.3.1&#8211;159&#038;pageseq=88</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Canard Noir</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6086</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Canard Noir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6086</guid>
		<description>Shang had a clearly stated methodology and picked trials according to it. Homeopaths do not appear to get this.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyway, would not want to get between you and taking money off your customers anymore. Hope you are having fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shang had a clearly stated methodology and picked trials according to it. Homeopaths do not appear to get this.</p>
<p>Anyway, would not want to get between you and taking money off your customers anymore. Hope you are having fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6085</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/08/charles-darwin-and-homeopathy.html#comment-6085</guid>
		<description>Shang et al only used 16% classical homeopathic prescribing. As even you have to admit that is a ludicrous starting point. Regarding bias the scientists who conducted the meta admitted a bias against homeopathy therefore their wittling down of 110 trials to 8 homeopathy and six conventional is farcical. They also admitted the homeopathic 8 were better quality than the conventional trials. In addition they picked one particularly scaving arnica trial and dismissed some very thorough trials that were very positive. Meta based on 8 or six trials is totally unscientific. You can&#039;t have it both ways; throwing out trials for bias when the organisers are clearly biased themselves. The debate is over on shang. Only rabid drug dealers of the worst kind quote from it now.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t have time to debate this on another link and frankly I don&#039;t wish to debate with such an obsequious abusive little turd like you anymore as I have clients to cure. Adios and if you do find any RCT&#039;s proving the efficacy of vaccines do let me know. I&#039;ll let you get back to destroying children&#039;s immune systems. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shang et al only used 16% classical homeopathic prescribing. As even you have to admit that is a ludicrous starting point. Regarding bias the scientists who conducted the meta admitted a bias against homeopathy therefore their wittling down of 110 trials to 8 homeopathy and six conventional is farcical. They also admitted the homeopathic 8 were better quality than the conventional trials. In addition they picked one particularly scaving arnica trial and dismissed some very thorough trials that were very positive. Meta based on 8 or six trials is totally unscientific. You can&#8217;t have it both ways; throwing out trials for bias when the organisers are clearly biased themselves. The debate is over on shang. Only rabid drug dealers of the worst kind quote from it now.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have time to debate this on another link and frankly I don&#8217;t wish to debate with such an obsequious abusive little turd like you anymore as I have clients to cure. Adios and if you do find any RCT&#8217;s proving the efficacy of vaccines do let me know. I&#8217;ll let you get back to destroying children&#8217;s immune systems. <img src='http://www.quackometer.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
