Comments on: Tony Blair and Homeopathy http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html Experiments and Thoughts on Quackery, Health Beliefs and Pseudoscience Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Canard Blanc http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14571 Canard Blanc Wed, 16 Mar 2011 04:48:02 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14571 Pleased to oblige! Pleased to oblige!

]]> By: Mojo http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14567 Mojo Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:53:59 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14567 Well, science is arrogant, innit. Well, science is arrogant, innit.

]]> By: le canard noir http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14565 le canard noir Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:32:27 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14565 What a pleasure to have someone comment on my site who knows more than science can ever tell them. What a pleasure to have someone comment on my site who knows more than science can ever tell them.

]]> By: Canard Blanc http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14563 Canard Blanc Tue, 15 Mar 2011 04:07:54 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14563 No, it is not sad at all. Anyone who has experienced the benefits of classical homeopathy knows who is sad and who is happy. No science will ever change my mind. No, it is not sad at all. Anyone who has experienced the benefits of classical homeopathy knows who is sad and who is happy. No science will ever change my mind.

]]> By: Badly Shaved Monkey http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14562 Badly Shaved Monkey Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:01:35 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14562 "I think the best proof for homeopathy is personal experience." You're wrong. The sad thing is that you will not understand or accept that you are wrong. “I think the best proof for homeopathy is personal experience.”

You’re wrong. The sad thing is that you will not understand or accept that you are wrong.

]]> By: Canard Blanc http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14560 Canard Blanc Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:43:07 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-14560 I think the best proof for homeopathy is personal experience. Most of the critics of homeopathy are only quoting studies. Very few of them have gone to a competent homeopath. Find a good homeopath, try it and then you'll see. I think the best proof for homeopathy is personal experience.
Most of the critics of homeopathy are only quoting studies. Very few of them have gone to a competent homeopath. Find a good homeopath, try it and then you’ll see.

]]> By: Politicians, their babies & MMR « gimpy’s blog http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-12265 Politicians, their babies & MMR « gimpy’s blog Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:19:20 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-12265 [...] Blair, the former Labour Prime Minister, whose willingness to indulge his wife, Cherie’s, association with alternative health gurus, who are typically associated with anti-vaccination views, has been accused of giving credibility [...] [...] Blair, the former Labour Prime Minister, whose willingness to indulge his wife, Cherie’s, association with alternative health gurus, who are typically associated with anti-vaccination views, has been accused of giving credibility [...]

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-8631 Anonymous Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:10:13 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-8631 I have never read such a load of tosh, shouldnt you two just meet and poke each other in the eye!! I have never read such a load of tosh, shouldnt you two just meet and poke each other in the eye!!

]]> By: Le Canard Noir http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-7255 Le Canard Noir Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:43:00 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-7255 atomic bombs? whatever.<br/><br/>The evidence for your 'powerful' medicine is just overwhelming, isn't it? atomic bombs? whatever.

The evidence for your ‘powerful’ medicine is just overwhelming, isn’t it?

]]> By: Dana Ullman http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-7253 Dana Ullman Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:12:00 +0000 http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2007/12/tony-blair-and-homeopathy.html#comment-7253 Actually, Oscillococcinum is not 30C; it is 200C (even more potentized!). It is inaccuate to say that it is more "dilute," just as one doesn't say that an atomic bomb is more "dilute" than conventional bombs. <br/><br/>Four large independent trials of Oscillo, and you still insist that it is all fraud. Sounds like this duck is stuck in the mud.<br/><br/>And the study on fibromyalgia in RHEUMATOLOGY (2004) found clinical relevance AND changes in EEG (is that objective enough for ya?)... Actually, Oscillococcinum is not 30C; it is 200C (even more potentized!). It is inaccuate to say that it is more “dilute,” just as one doesn’t say that an atomic bomb is more “dilute” than conventional bombs.

Four large independent trials of Oscillo, and you still insist that it is all fraud. Sounds like this duck is stuck in the mud.

And the study on fibromyalgia in RHEUMATOLOGY (2004) found clinical relevance AND changes in EEG (is that objective enough for ya?)…

]]>