<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scepticism is the New Rock’n’Roll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html</link>
	<description>Experiments and Thoughts on Quackery, Health Beliefs and Pseudoscience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:52:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-8006</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-8006</guid>
		<description>John H&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;I just looked at the Swift/JREF site.&lt;br /&gt;I can see shedloads of lighthearted banter and humour on there.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well, perhaps I&#039;m speaking past tense a little. &lt;br /&gt;A couple of us have been busily softening up the hardheads.&lt;br /&gt;And maybe my humour misses the mark at times - someone called it &quot;unconventional&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;regards,&lt;br /&gt;BillyJoe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John H</p>
<p>&#8220;I just looked at the Swift/JREF site.<br />I can see shedloads of lighthearted banter and humour on there.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, perhaps I&#8217;m speaking past tense a little. <br />A couple of us have been busily softening up the hardheads.<br />And maybe my humour misses the mark at times &#8211; someone called it &#8220;unconventional&#8221;.</p>
<p>regards,<br />BillyJoe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart McOwan</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-8005</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart McOwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-8005</guid>
		<description>John H sounds a right Happy Jack. Birmingham is the &#039;epicentre&#039;. What is that all about? UB40 have to be the crappiest band ever. They murdered so many decent songs without shame. Add to that the Move, Duran Duran and Ozzy Osbourne. What a pile of godforesaken trash. Brum is utter garbage apart from its Ethiopian restaurant I found with the greatest of difficulty.&lt;br /&gt;Glad that his better half despairs her eyes whenever he opens his stupid mouth in a social situtaion. He is obviously in severe need of a bullet or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John H sounds a right Happy Jack. Birmingham is the &#8216;epicentre&#8217;. What is that all about? UB40 have to be the crappiest band ever. They murdered so many decent songs without shame. Add to that the Move, Duran Duran and Ozzy Osbourne. What a pile of godforesaken trash. Brum is utter garbage apart from its Ethiopian restaurant I found with the greatest of difficulty.<br />Glad that his better half despairs her eyes whenever he opens his stupid mouth in a social situtaion. He is obviously in severe need of a bullet or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John H</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-7998</link>
		<dc:creator>John H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-7998</guid>
		<description>Billy Joe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just looked at the Swift/JREF site.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can see shedloads of lighthearted banter and humour on there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact there is probably as much pisstaking as there is serious comment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And you could hardly call Harriet Hall a po faced old scrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy Joe</p>
<p>I just looked at the Swift/JREF site.</p>
<p>I can see shedloads of lighthearted banter and humour on there.</p>
<p>In fact there is probably as much pisstaking as there is serious comment.</p>
<p>And you could hardly call Harriet Hall a po faced old scrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John H</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-7995</link>
		<dc:creator>John H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-7995</guid>
		<description>To NRG&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am not sure that &quot;Birmingham&#039;s complete lack of musical heritage&quot; is really valid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whether you like the music or not it is almost certainly true that Birmingham is the epicentre of heavy rock.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To Billy Joe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any chance of a URL for that reference ?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I get the impression that most sceptics are pretty lightened up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is far more humour on most sceptic sites than there is on most quackery sites (especially the jabbophobe and AIDS denialist sites). As far as I can see the quacks are a complete bunch of po-faced miserabilists ranting against the world, the government, science, regulation, pharma, doctors, the NHS etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I picture all the quacks in the world having what my granny would describe as a &quot;face like a cats arse&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To NRG</p>
<p>I am not sure that &#8220;Birmingham&#8217;s complete lack of musical heritage&#8221; is really valid.</p>
<p>Whether you like the music or not it is almost certainly true that Birmingham is the epicentre of heavy rock.</p>
<p>To Billy Joe</p>
<p>Any chance of a URL for that reference ?  </p>
<p>I get the impression that most sceptics are pretty lightened up.</p>
<p>There is far more humour on most sceptic sites than there is on most quackery sites (especially the jabbophobe and AIDS denialist sites). As far as I can see the quacks are a complete bunch of po-faced miserabilists ranting against the world, the government, science, regulation, pharma, doctors, the NHS etc.</p>
<p>I picture all the quacks in the world having what my granny would describe as a &#8220;face like a cats arse&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-7993</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-7993</guid>
		<description>teekblog &quot;tackling really important and serious issues with humour and scepticism gets the message across so much more effectively that authoritarian Statism or dumbed-down meeja rubbish.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Australian Skeptics have been doing this for a couple of decades now through their magazine &quot;The Skeptic&quot;. Glad to see it&#039;s finally catching on. However, if my experience with &quot;Swift&quot; at the JREF site is any guide, it&#039;ll take a bit of doing to get most sceptics to lighten up a little. Nobody there seems to understand humour at all. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;regards,&lt;br /&gt;BillyJoe&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS: Read John H&#039;s first comment here and you have a bit of an idea what we&#039;re up against.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>teekblog &#8220;tackling really important and serious issues with humour and scepticism gets the message across so much more effectively that authoritarian Statism or dumbed-down meeja rubbish.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Australian Skeptics have been doing this for a couple of decades now through their magazine &#8220;The Skeptic&#8221;. Glad to see it&#8217;s finally catching on. However, if my experience with &#8220;Swift&#8221; at the JREF site is any guide, it&#8217;ll take a bit of doing to get most sceptics to lighten up a little. Nobody there seems to understand humour at all. </p>
<p>regards,<br />BillyJoe</p>
<p>PS: Read John H&#8217;s first comment here and you have a bit of an idea what we&#8217;re up against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-7992</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-7992</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thanks to you guys for organising the event - it was nice to see Ben and to meet you in the flesh. Well worth battling the Oxford one-way system for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks to you guys for organising the event &#8211; it was nice to see Ben and to meet you in the flesh. Well worth battling the Oxford one-way system for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NRG</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-7988</link>
		<dc:creator>NRG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-7988</guid>
		<description>All too accurate with the rock n roll comparison, Birmingham&#039;s complete lack of musical heritage being reflected in the failure of our local skeptics in the pub group to even decide on a venue before fizzling out.  Time to give them a bit of a prod, now I know they exist...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All too accurate with the rock n roll comparison, Birmingham&#8217;s complete lack of musical heritage being reflected in the failure of our local skeptics in the pub group to even decide on a venue before fizzling out.  Time to give them a bit of a prod, now I know they exist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John H</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-7984</link>
		<dc:creator>John H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-7984</guid>
		<description>Andy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This might be off message here but I am not sure where else to post it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The quackery of the day was superb. I nearly choked on my tuna reading about the water energetic vortexisator. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have not seen that much condensed quackery since I looked at the Scary Mary shipwreck&#039;n&#039;woo site.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It did get me thinking though. There is so much superdense bullshit on that site that I think they are con merchants rather than woosters. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At first read it looks as if it should be on the uncyclopaedia site (which was another brilliant steer by the way - so thanks).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reading between the lines my guess is that these shysters had a load of old toot and dressed it up in quackery to flog it to the gullible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am not sure that conmen rooking the gullible is worse than the gullible rooking themselves. Either way a fool and their money are soon parted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy</p>
<p>This might be off message here but I am not sure where else to post it.</p>
<p>The quackery of the day was superb. I nearly choked on my tuna reading about the water energetic vortexisator. </p>
<p>I have not seen that much condensed quackery since I looked at the Scary Mary shipwreck&#8217;n'woo site.</p>
<p>It did get me thinking though. There is so much superdense bullshit on that site that I think they are con merchants rather than woosters. </p>
<p>At first read it looks as if it should be on the uncyclopaedia site (which was another brilliant steer by the way &#8211; so thanks).</p>
<p>Reading between the lines my guess is that these shysters had a load of old toot and dressed it up in quackery to flog it to the gullible.</p>
<p>I am not sure that conmen rooking the gullible is worse than the gullible rooking themselves. Either way a fool and their money are soon parted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SVETLANA PERTSOVICH</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-7983</link>
		<dc:creator>SVETLANA PERTSOVICH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-7983</guid>
		<description>John, probably you seek friends in wrong place ;) Moreover, I guess you have friends, certainly. &lt;br /&gt;And as for credulous maids, instead of your laughing at poor dame, better propose her some good medicine for her cats. If parasites come away from cats for 1 day instead of  3 days, even your hapless friend will be capable to count it (I hope she is capable to see a difference between 1 and 3 :) ). And main result of your experiment will be that henceforth she will rate you as a great wiseacre and expert! :) :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, probably you seek friends in wrong place <img src='http://www.quackometer.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Moreover, I guess you have friends, certainly. <br />And as for credulous maids, instead of your laughing at poor dame, better propose her some good medicine for her cats. If parasites come away from cats for 1 day instead of  3 days, even your hapless friend will be capable to count it (I hope she is capable to see a difference between 1 and 3 <img src='http://www.quackometer.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). And main result of your experiment will be that henceforth she will rate you as a great wiseacre and expert! <img src='http://www.quackometer.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.quackometer.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramel</title>
		<link>http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2009/05/scepticism-is-new-rocknroll.html#comment-7982</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quackometer.net/wpblog/2009/05/scepticism-is-the-new-rock%e2%80%99n%e2%80%99roll.html#comment-7982</guid>
		<description>Sounds fantastic, hopfully we&#039;ll get one up north eventually. The only point I disagree with you on is that there sould never be another franchise fusion in the style of Aliens vs. Predator, that was a terrible film (althought the PC game was prettty good).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds fantastic, hopfully we&#8217;ll get one up north eventually. The only point I disagree with you on is that there sould never be another franchise fusion in the style of Aliens vs. Predator, that was a terrible film (althought the PC game was prettty good).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
