This is worth spelling out absolutely explicitly – the resulting drug resistance does not only "stand a high chance of killing someone with TB" although that would be bad enough in the case of what is now a highly-treatable illness from which people can make pretty much a full recovery.

Interrupting treatment also raises the possibility of allowing drug-resistant strains of the illness to enter the general population – through simple methods like coughing, sneezing or talking – and to ultimately cause a new TB epidemic. That could in turn be hard to treat with the cheapest and most effective available antibiotics.

"In the notes, H appears to conspire with the patient to only take rifampicin, which can colour urine red, and another drug which may show up in a urine test, to convince the doctors that the treatment regime was being adhered to."

I was also very interested in the fact that the homeopath, who presumably is contemptuous of science-based medicine, still appeared to have such a comprehensive understanding of the drug treatments that they knew how to circumvent medical checks.

The consequences of the actions described above are severe enough if those were carried out on a single occasion and affected one individual.

If it is established that this has happened repeeatedly, it should be sufficient grounds to get every homeopath on this bloody island shut down with immediate effect.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/health/ten-in-ten-homeopathic-prescriptions-contain-mistakes-200912032281/

The reason I sent these notes to Le Canard Noir was precisely because I knew that one law, at least, was stated to be broken. Aiding someone to circumvent their TB medication. I wondered if it was possible to take action. Le Canard Noir has, in my opinion, done well to bring this into the open. These lectures used to be given annually and I would expect that they still are.

I was concerned that other laws have been broken too. My feeling is that to do anything about these matters would require corroborative evidence. As Le Canard Noir states, if anyone else is concerned and has corroboration, even if that is oral and a witnessing, please do get in contact.

To throw a spanner in the works, always bear in mind the possibility that he was 'selling the dream'. It is equally possible that these were stories and videos made up to sell us the wonders of homeopathy. Since that IS the story given to us, I feel it should be treated at face value; for the arrogance and disrespect for the law and public welfare that it claims.

I affirmed to Le CN that these are the actual notes, unamended that I took on the day, and would stand by that in Court.

If any current homeopaths are having concerns and would like to get in contact with me then I would be happy to discuss this with you and, with more up to date evidence, take appropriate action.