QuackSafeTM Search Engine

Thursday, October 26, 2006

Le Canard Noir is pleased to announce the arrival of the Quackometer QuackSafeTM Search Engine. Do you quickly need to debunk the latest fraudulent claim? Do you need to see if others have insight into a quack? This is the Search Engine for you.

The Search Engine will only return matches from sites and blogs that are known to supply reliable information about quackery, quacks, medical fraud and health realetd pseudoscience. It is based on the newly available Google Coop technology, but unlike Google, will not return sites that swallow fraudulent medical claims whole.

Start QuackSafeTM searching here.

The Quackometer QuackSafeTM Google Toolbar Button has been updated to allow one button access to the Search Engine from the Google Search box on the toolbar. If you have already installed the toolbar Button, it will automatically upgrade itself in the background. To access thw Quackometer Search Engine, just enter your query into the the toolbar button and just click the little black duck icon.

To install the Toolbar button, click on this link and follow the instructions.

At present, there are about 50 sites that are included in the search. Selection of these sites is based on them being providers of critical thinking about the claims of quacks or their investigations into health fraud. Sites are not included that just provide general health advice or research. There are better places to find this information and the quackometer is not a health advisory service.

Wikipedia is also not included, as after consideration, its articles on quack related subjects often suffer from the 'BBC fallacy' - that the truth is found in a balance of opinions.

If the quackometer is failing to find articles from sites that you believe will add value, then please drop me a line.

If you wish to collaborate on this site and help improve the search results, then please drop me a line.

Labels: , ,

 

 

3 Comments View blog reactions


The Scent of a Quack...

Friday, October 20, 2006

At last, what appears to be some reasonable criticism of high street quackery in the Daily Mail...

Well, it sort of starts out OK with a report as follows:

... according to a report in Psychiatric Bulletin, health shops give out bad advice on depression and they offer a range of useless stuff, including the cruel-sounding cat's claw, when only one of their products, St John's Wort, is scientifically proved to have any antidepressant effect.


Great - an expose of the nonsense dished out in heath food shops. Our intrepid investigative journalist, Jill Parkin, then sets out to do her own research and pops into her own local health food shop with the following hilarious observation...

Inside, what an aroma! It's licorice stick, ageing raspberry leaf tea and, most distinctive of all, people who use natural deodorants. They're about as effective on sweat as cat's claw on depression.
Unfortunately, whilst amusing, this is about as far as the article goes in criticising the herb dealers. The overall impression from this article is that what is wrong with these shops is not that they are bordering on the fraudulent and dangerous with unsupported and dubious claims for all sorts of shit, but that these shops are not commercial enough with smart staff, good lighting and proper consumer-orientated goods. The article implies that all staff in places like Holland and Barrett are miserable, unwashed, butch lesbians and so have little to offer good-old Middle-England Daily Hate readers.

By trying to be funny and mocking the cardboard-eating hippy end of the health fraud industry, a really important story slips by - that going to these shops to treat depression is likely to end with the customer being ripped-off and with a potentially dangerous illness left untreated. The good old Daily Mail readers' comments at the end show how the story has gone down, and it is not as intended...
I've been a regular at health food shops for years, and have never come across anything like the above. These shops serve a purpose while the supermarkets slowly catch up. Long may they thrive.- Loveday , Oxford
The story is more of a call to make quackery more commercialised than an expose on the utter lack of credibility that these 'tofu-pushers' have. By providing and 'alternative' for people with depression and by not being honest about the efficacy of what they offer, the Health Food scammers are causing misery. Still, I must remember the 'people who use natural deodorants' gag.

Labels:

 

 

0 Comments View blog reactions


QuackSafeTM Surfing with the Quackometer Toolbar Button

Friday, October 13, 2006


Le Canard Noir is pleased to announce the arrival of the Quackometer QuackSafeTM Toolbar Button for Internet Explorer that will allow one-click access to the Quackometer and QuackSafeTM Search Engine. Click the button to find out if your current page is Quackery. Highlight a name in the text and click the button to find out if they might be a quack. Type a query into the Google Toolbar search button and click the Quackometer button for reliable search results.


UPDATE: The Toolbar button now has access to the QuackSafeTM Search Engine. Simply enter your query into the Google Toolbar and hit the duck's head.


As a sophisticated reader of my site, you may feel that you too can spot a quack a mile off. But in these days of devious and deluded quackery, do you feel it is safe for your family, loved ones, elderly relatives and pets to surf the net without adequate protection from quackery? The QuackSafeTM Toolbar button is for you. Installation is easy and will not compromise your computer or wallet.

Install now before your money gets spent on homeopathy and ear candles.

Features:

There are four ways to use the button: Click, Highlight, Type or Drop-Down. All do different things...


  1. Click the toolbar button to send your current page to the quackometer. Instantly see if you are reading horse-shit.
  2. Highlight a suspect quack's name in your current page with your mouse and click the toolbar button. The Quackometer will analyse the name to see if they are associated with quackery on the web.




  3. Type a search term into the Google Toolbar search box and click the button. The Quackometer will use QuackSafe Searching to find out reliable sources of anti-quackery information.
  4. Click the drop-down list to see the latest insane quack stories from the daily newspapers.

To Install...

  1. You need to be running the Google Toolbar. You can read about it here. Currently, only Internet Explorer has been tested. Watch out for Firefox!
  2. Click on this link to install. Follow the instructions. If the Google toolbar is not installed, you will be prompted to do so now.





  3. It is that easy! Be QuackSafeTM!

Safety, Security and Privacy.

  1. A simple and small XML file is saved on your computer. No executable. No spy-ware. Nothing.
  2. When you click on the button, your browser is redirected to the quackometer web site with details of the current page you are surfing or the suspect quack's name you want to analyse. No personal data is sent to the little black duck. I don't want it, even if it did.
  3. There is nothing much more to it.
  4. To uninstall, go to the Google Toolbar Settings.
  5. Any other questions - you know where to find me...

Surf Safe. Surf QuackSafeTM.

Don't delay! The Reiki Masters and Reflexologists are after your hard earned wonga! Its either this or you will be asked to get someone you care about a QLink for Christmas.

Labels: ,

 

 

3 Comments Links to this post View blog reactions


Ethical Quackery, the Monarchy and Kate Moss

Thursday, October 12, 2006

No, this is not about our Defender of Quackery, our Quack-in-Chief His Royal Quackiness, Prince Charles, but about the Distinguished Provost of the Royal College of Alternative Medicine, Professor Joseph Chikelue Obi. And yes, it is just a rather lame story written solely to get a picture of Kate on my blog.

I've written a rather lazy blog on the distinguished professor before that was just a bit of a gawp at his quacktastic website and what looks like a health phone-line scam.

Well, I've done a little more digging with Google and it has revealed a few quack gems. It has been pretty hard work, since Google returns some 6,000 pages, the vast majority just appears to be Prof Obi's self-promotion. However, if you persist in digging a few interesting facts turn up.

So, what has the little black duck found out about the "most Controversial Retired Physician and 'A-List' Medical Celebrity, Dr Joseph Chikelue Obi"?

Here we go...

1. The Irish Independent reports that his college does not exist at the Dublin address given on the web site. There's a surprise! It's just a front.

2. The Independent goes on. "In January 2003, he was suspended by for serious professional misconduct at South Tyneside District Hospital. Among the allegations made were that he failed to attend to patients, wrote strange notes about colleagues and at one point gave a dating agency phone number to a psychiatric patient."

3. He was being investigated by the police for taking thousands of pounds of a 58 year old woman to in order to cure a long standing illness.

4. The GMC strike Dr Obi off their register for "serious professional misconduct". So much for him being retired.

5. On another tack, Dr Obi has been involved in a little cyber-squatting. This looks as if it took place while he was a doctor - always after a few quid!

6. Since then, now self-titled Prof Obi, a few new avenues have been opened, including trying to entice Kate Moss away to one of his 'safe-houses' in Ireland. Hat's off!

He is quoted as saying:

"Under the European Convention on Human Rights, Miss Moss still has fundamental rights, just like anyone else out there, and as far as I am concerned, she is not guilty of anything until an Ethical Jury says so."
(I mentioned before that 'ethical' was one of his favourite words.)

7. Prof Obi has been developing a Penis Enlarger (watch out Kate) that his own Royal College has now endorsed.

8. At least one person (out of the targeted million) has paid Prof Obi the fees for his college to accredit them. Dr Michael Keet (8 Canards) of the Central London College of Reflexology handed over 'hundreds'. Do we feel sorry for out-quacked quacks? I guess we ought to.

9. For those of you wanting to see behind the grand titles and see the real human being, Joseph lists his interests as Comedy in London, Whole Food Nutrition and Christian Music. On this 'Meetup' site, he describes himself as "Just a very ordinary guy . . .". That's nice.

10. His name appears very often on the blog Abolish The General Medical Council (GMC), often reporting something he has got up to. The blog describes itself as:

An ethical blog for those who publicly feel that the General Medical Council (GMC) should be Statutorily Abolished in favour of a Medical Licensing Commission (MLC) to solely register and revalidate Doctors who practise Conventional Medicine in the UK. The Blog also recommends that the GMC/MLC hands all disciplinary functions over to an Independent Clinical Tribunal (ICT) in keeping with the EU Convention on Human Rights ; to avoid (both) Institutional Bias and Multiple Jeopardy.

Oooh. There is that word 'ethical' again. And 'European Human Rights'. No name is given for the blog author but the avatar is a portrait of the queen. Another apparent obsession of Prof Obi - royalty. Could the author be none other than the Professor himself, a little agrieved for his ticking off? I hope you all click through to the blog. Maybe we will show up in his stats and whoever the writer is can get in contact and confirm one way or another.

I rather hope is is, as the final thing I turned up would just be fantastic...

11. Is the Distinguished Provost of the Royal College of Alternative Medicine, Professor Obi now selling ethical ring-tones? I do hope so.

Watch out Crazy Frog! Here comes the Crazy Provost...







Postscript

It does look like Prof Obi has read this blog. He claims on the blog 'Abolish The General Medical Council' the following...


And now we have the GMC sending the 'half-wit' Quackometer Bloggers after me, who (by the way) don't even know the very meaning of the word 'Quack'.
Excellent. So I am a GMC Shill now to add to my credentials. Black ducks are not that clever, but half-witted is a bit harsh. And I don't know the meaning of the word quack. As usual for a quack, not a shred of evidence to support his claims that I have anything to do with the GMC.

I have a feeling this story will re-appear. But first, I must download that ringtone...


Labels:

 

 

11 Comments Links to this post View blog reactions


Quack Word #40: 'Energy'


Or 'How to be debunked by a nine year old schoolgirl'

In the special world of the quack, the crank and the pseudo-scientist the word 'Energy' holds the highest place in the league tables of misappropriated and abused language.

I often get complaints that the quackometer only spots quacks and lets cranks off the hook. That is deliberate on my part - one thing at a time. The crank is easy to tell from the quack: the crank seeks 'free' energy, the quack seeks 'healing' energy. The crank seeks an endless supply of useful energy from spinning rotors and magnets; the quack seeks an infinite source of healing energy from spinning arms and language.

Both cranks and quacks like to talk about 'energy' all the time. Energy has an everyday meaning that we can relate to (our 'energy' to do things) and a rock solid physics definition (the capacity to do work). Maybe that is why energy is such a useful pseudo-scientific concept as we have an intuitive grasp of what it means, but little idea of the scientific details. The crank/quack fills in the gaps for us with their own pseudoscience.

At least the crank has some capacity to understand what energy is - the capacity to do work - even if they have limited understanding of the laws of thermodynamics. The quack however, uses the word energy, just like any other word borrowed from the sciences, with little regard to establishing a definition or consistent meaning. Indeed, vagueness and slipperiness are essential in the quacks cause.

Quack Energy has many different forms, or manifestations, depending on the particular field of woo being considered, Quack Energy has explanatory roles in Reiki, QiGong, Touch Therapy, Biofield Therapy, Acupuncture, Homeopathy and just about any other 'discipline' where science suggests the technique ought to be nonsense. Quack Energy is used to corrupt and subvert logic. It is claimed that because science cannot explain the healing capacity of reiki/acupuncture/qigong then it must be due to a new universal life-force energy. It does not occur to the practitioner that there might not be anything to explain.

The names for Quack Energy are legion: Mana, Energy, Qi, Aura, Chi, Ki and so. In debating with woos, I like to lump them altogether as MEQUACK.

Although, MEQUACK has different origins within the different fake medicines, there are some common properties:


  • The Energy is 'Subtle'. Indeed, it is often called 'Subtle Energy'. MEQUACK has to be subtle as no-one has proposed a way of measuring it or even detecting it. So subtle indeed, that it escapes all the very sensitive scientific instruments we have at our disposal.
  • MEQUACK is a 'life force', or 'biofield'. Despite is being subtle, it somehow has a very important relationship to our health. Despite no instrument being able to detect it, somehow our bodies can.
  • MEQUACK flows around our body in someway and can get blocked, or disrupted, causing illness. Sometimes the energy uses some sort of MEQUACK channel in the body, like a meridian, or is centred in special places in the body, like a Chakra. You've guessed it, none of these flows or centres have ever been found, detected or observed.
  • MEQUACK can get disrupted by our modern lifestyles and surroundings. The electrical and magnetic fields in our homes, somehow can also interact with our biofield MEQUACK, even when our sensitive electrical and magnetic scientific instruments cannot.

What is so galling to anyone with a scientific background is that energy, as a concept, is so well understood. Energy comes in many forms: chemical, kinetic, nuclear, thermal, potential and so on. All are convertible from one form to another. Light a firework rocket and chemical energy is quickly converted to sound energy, thermal, electromagnetic (light) and kinetic energy as the fuel burns and the rocket launches upwards. Kinetic energy, under gravity, is then transformed into potential energy and back again as it descends to earth. At the end, all that chemical energy has been converted to thermal energy. No energy was lost or created - always conserved - and all in ways that are thoroughly understood by science with lots of maths to work out what will happen. We are expected to believe that in all the years of experimentation, a form of energy exists, that is vital to our bodies, that has never shown up in our accounting for what happens.

MEQUACK has no conservation laws, no conversion mechanisms, no mathematics, no means of detection, no capacity for harnessing in an engine and doing work - its properties tend to get very vague when examined. Still, somehow, it is vital for life and health. Despite the so-called ancient origins of the knowledge of MEQUACK, no physics or biology textbook denotes a sentence to it, let alone a chapter.

So, why do quacks keep on about it? Talk of MEQUACK is often given in attempt to justify otherwise ridiculous claims. A quick example: The QLink pendant. We have seen this bauble in previous posts. The floggers of this tat invoke 'resonating subtle energies' as an explanation of how it works.

In this ridiculous page, Dr. William Tiller explains how:

Scientists have long puzzled over force field phenomena that do not fit the four known forces: electromagnetic, gravity, weak and strong forces. These force field that do not fall into the classical four are sometimes labeled "subtle energies." They are called "subtle" because they cannot be observed or measured by any known instrumentation.

It's difficult to know where to begin, but the first question would be: "What field phenomena?" Science has done an amazing job of distilling all known phenomena into four forces! Secondly I would ask: "If they cannot be observed by any instrumentation, how do you know they exist?"

This is typical of the garbled quack nonsense speak. Dr Teller goes on to explain that:

Electromagnetic fields are composed of two basic types of energy wave packets:
electrons and photons.

The high school physicists amongst you will be able to spot the simple error in this statement. This is not even wrong, it is just nonsense.

If this example is typical, then we can see that talk of MEQUACK is not meant to explain anything - it is designed to deflect enquiry and bamboozle. It deflects enquiry by quickly getting into technical jargon that most people will not, or cannot, explore further. For those, with a slightly less credulous bent, it deflects enquiry by essentially postulating that all attempts to detect or measure MEQUACK are futile as it is too 'subtle' to be detected by clumsy, reductionist, non-holistic, closed-minded, arrogant scientists and their instruments. Invoking MEQUACK is an act of fraud and deception. My guess is though, that many of the practitioners and exponents of the many forms of MEQUACK have first utterly deceived themselves.

So, to summarise so far:

  • MEQUACK is a supposed life force energy;
  • it has never been detected;
  • it has no theory to explain it;
  • MEQUACK has conflicting explanations across quack disciplines;
  • is supposedly under attack from modern lifestyles to give rise to illnesses that are not recognised, or have very poor evidence bases, such EMF-stress
  • MEQUACK can be manipulated by 'healers' by shamanically waving their arms above you (reiki), sticking pins in you (acupuncture, voodoo), wearing the right colours (chakras), giving you 'energetically charged' pills (homeopathy), or wearing a christmas cracker trinket (the QLink).

With so little going for it, it is amazing that so many people believe so passionately in it. Maybe it is because there are consistent reports of people feeling warmth and tingling when undergoing some sort of MEQUACK non-touch 'healing' ritual, such as QiGong, Reiki or (the modern favourite) Bi-Aura. That is pretty powerful evidence! Being able to detect the warmth and tingling in your nerves! Wow!

So, if you can really feel MEQUACK, then maybe science ought to sit up and take notice. Indeed, such a simple demonstration ought to be easy and it would convince me straight away. Show me you can feel this 'energy' and the world will listen. It ought to be so easy, in fact, that a nine year old could do it.

In fact, a nine year old has done it.

The youngest person ever to publish a scientific, peer-reviewed paper in a prestigious medical journal was Emily Rosa. Emily wanted to test if energy therapists could really sense MEQUACK. Twenty-one therapists agreed to takes part; how could they refuse a sweet little nine year old doing a school project?

In the test, the therapist would put both their hands through a screen. Unseen, Emily would place one of her own hands over one the practitioners hands and the 'therapist' was asked to say which hand it was. All therapists claimed that they could perform this test - the results though showed that their guesses were no better than chance (they got 123 out of 280 trials right). Emily's parents helped her with the stats and the experiment was publised in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). The editors described the study as 'solid gold'.

Her conclusoins were;

Twenty-one experienced TT [Theraputic Touch] practitioners were unable to detect the investigator's "energy field." Their failure to substantiate TT's most fundamental claim is unrefuted evidence that the claims of TT are groundless and that further professional use is unjustified.

Naturally, many 'energy therapists' have cried fowl. A full list of rebuttals can be found on the quackwatch site. What is amazing is this study cost about $10 for the screen. Any 'therapist' could do this test themselves as long as they were intellectually honest enough to properly blind themselves and remove obvious sources of bias. I think this shows how little the advocates of strange bio-energy are interested in the truth. Only their comforting delusions are important, and in some case, their fraudulent money-making practices.

So what is going on with the therapists? Why do they really believe they can feel MEQUACK. Well, self-deception can be very powerful. Expectations can make you feel things that aren't really there. Now the little black duck is quite ticklish. Even the thought of being tickled can make me tingle. Maybe the MEQUACKists are feeling something similar: anticipation, expectation and wishful thinking? What is for sure, as Emily (aged 9) has shown, they do not feel a bio-energy.

Labels: , , ,

 

 

6 Comments Links to this post View blog reactions


"Once Dismissed as Hokum..." A Guide to Writing About Quackery in the Mail

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

"Once Dismissed as Hokum" is how Dr Danny Penman begins with a less-than-half-truth in his quacktasticly exceptional article about Spiritual Healing in the Daily Mail, "Could spiritual healing actually work?"

This article ought to serve as a case study in how to write about nonsense quackery for the madder end of the British Press. I thought it worthwhile to dissect this piece to show how you can write supportively about completely batshit ideas without telling too many porkies.

1. Ensure the Title has a question mark at the end. Give the impression of honest enquiry and an open mind - an appeal to be "Open Minded".

2. As a journalist, flaunt your qualifications, awards and titles. Danny Penman signs the article with his title, 'Dr'. Note that Dr Danny Penman got his PhD in Biochemisty studying fungus on cocoa crops, not a medical subject. This is a blatant appeal to authority as we have previously discussed.

3. Start off with some dodgy anecdotes. Personal experience is always convincing for some reason. Testimonials can make up for a complete lack of evidence if required. In this case, an anecdote about ME is particularly unconvincing. ME is a chronic disease that is cyclical in its nature and is subject to spontaneous remission. How do we know spiritual healing caused the improvement? Of course, we do not. This is commiting the 'Pragmatic Falacy' - it works for me!

4. Talk about how 'scientists' or 'experts' are being swayed by the evidence. No need to mention any names, and if you do, no need to mention that these a fringe characters not in the mainstream of the profession. Even better, count people with 'para-' or 'alternative' prefixes as if they were real academics. Note the inclusion of a 'parapsychologist' in this article as if this genuine discipline without controversy.

5. Give no references to research. No one will check them anyway. Talk about unpublished research as if it was of the same rigour as independently, peer-reviewed published papers.

6. Talk about discredited or retracted work as if it was still important. No one is going to check. The work about cardiac patients is old now and has been discredited and superseded by better studies that showed that prayer had no effect (or, if it did, prayer made things worse for patients.)

7. Do not mention any work that may contradict what you are trying to say. There is no need to be balanced for this type of story, nor is there any reason to weight evidence according to its merit. Remember, you are after a good story. You are not making an enquiry into the truth - the truth does not sell.

8 . Appeal to peoples' prejudices and beg the question. Remember, Mail readers want their prejudices confirmed - never challenged. That is why they read the paper to ensure their views on race, immigrants, lefties and Europe are always on the front page and routinely confirmed. For quackery, those prejudices include a distrust of any authority, academics, atheists, foreigners and the (nannying) government.

9. Make sure you have a good comments section. Your good readers will supply the bits even you are embarrassed to write and they can get away with spectacular nonsense that even you might wince at.

Dr Penman sticks well to all of these rules. I emailed him to ask if he really believes what he has written. I did not get an answer to this, but he kindly sent me papers and articles that backed up his story, but surprisingly, also articles that shot holes in it. Why no mention of them in the article? Seriously, if this story had any merit, it would be the most groundbreaking medical story in a millennium.

I will leave the final word to the brave persons who left comments for this story on the Mail web site. Perhaps these comments slipped passed the usually diligent Mail moderators by being slyly flattering in their opening words...

The most wondrous thing about these miracle cures is the ease with which patients can become practitioners. Imagine a patient whose life is saved by, say, neurosurgery becoming a neurosurgeon herself. Of course, that probably doesn't happen too often, what with all those years of study and self-denial. But in the amazing world of "alternative" medicine, all one needs to become a "master" is willingness, an open mind, and faith. Oh, also mind-boggling credulity, the ability to wave one's hands around a "patient" with an appearance of purpose, and a modest sum of cash.

- Mick Houlahan, Chicago, USA

Yes, what a wonderful article, and beautifully referenced with comments from many doctors who are completely unbiased and who have absolutely no preconceptions about spirituality and complementary medicine. Of course nature will cure us all, as it has done for centuries, particularly when spiritualism and Christianity were at their height (you know, when life expectancy was 35 and 3 in 5 kids died before their 5th birthday).

- Deetee, Blackpool, UK

It's incredible the power of our own mind, apart from that it's poppycock.

- Steve Webster, Amsterdam, Netherlands (exiled)


PS Danny - seriously, if you read this - hope the broken bones are OK and I'm glad you didn't resort to healing them spiritually!

Labels: ,

 

 

0 Comments View blog reactions


Organic Milk Is/Is Not Healthier

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Those of you paying attention will have seen the quackometer spot these two stories from the past few weeks in the Daily Mail:

Organic milk 'better for a healthy diet'
29th August 2006

Organic milk is not healthier, says food watchdog
21st September 2006

So, just a few weeks apart and completely different slants. As an act of kindness, to save you from the pain of reading these articles and deciding between them, I have condensed them into one easy-to-read organic milk heath scare/health promotion story...

'Experts' say Organic Milk Is/Is Not Healthier
The Daily Mail
Organic milk has more/fewer benefits than standard milk and official advice should reflect this, 'experts' have said. A succession of studies in Britain and around the world have found higher levels/the same level of vital nutrients, particularly omega-3.

They want the FSA to change/keep its stance on organic milk, and "recognise that there are differences/no differences between organic and non-organic milk". The decision is a body blow/boost to organic dairy farmers, who have seen a boom/drop in sales on the back of a belief that it is healthier/more expensive, particularly for children/cats.

Such a pronouncement would have been a huge promotion/blow to the standing of organic agriculture and, particularly, organic milk. A spokeswoman for the Government said she could not say whether the research would alter their position as they needed time to examine the evidence, unlike the reporters of this newspaper.

The findings have pleased/upset organic farming supporters as well as the scientists involved in the study. The Soil Association, which promotes organic farming, praised/challenged the conclusions whilst talking its usual pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo.

Publicity for this research has driven a remarkable boost/nose-dive in sales, with consumption up/down a staggering 50per cent in the past year. Some supermarkets, such as Tesco, have resorted to importing/exporting supplies from/to Europe/deep-sea dumps.

Lord Melchett, at the Soil Association, said: "The scientists never/always suggested that organic milk was a substitute for eating oily/battered fish. It is not, but there are significant/no nutritional differences. "Knowing that, we believe that people are bright/gullible enough to make up their own minds on whether organic milk is better/more expensive for them.


Reader comments (8)
8 people have commented on this story so far. Tell us what you think below.

I completely disagree with all these so called experts findings. I buy organic milk and many other products because I do not want plutonium in my system. We all know farmers spray dangerous radioactive waste on their crops and I don't want my family mutating.
- Anne, Cambridge

I am forced to drink non-organic milk as it is cheaper and it is all I can afford after loosing my job to an invasion of polish plumbers.
- Dave (ex Heart Surgeon), Nuneaton

Its common sense that organic milk is healthier. Non-organic cows are made of concrete with very low milk productivity.
- Simon, Milton Keynes

Since drinking only organic milk, I have seen a remarkable improvement in my childrens' IQs and school marks. Unfortunately, they are now so clever, they can now see their parents are half-witted morons for buying this deeply offensive and ignorant newspaper.
- Mathilde, Hounslow

Another plot by Tony and his Euro-cronies to make us drink immigrant organic milk. The cost of organic milk is just another of Gordon's stealth taxes designed to punish us for being English.
- Bartholemew, Barking

Top Tip. Save money by buying non-organic milk and then performing inexpensive Reiki over your fridge each morning. Reiki has been proven to 'energetically' remove pesticides from milk as well as any sane thoughts in your head.
- Karen, Manchester

I have recently started buying organic milk because I find it makes a better cup of tea - and a creamier bowl of porridge - than supermarket-sold 'fresh' milk. Of course, I have proven this under strict randomized, double-blind procedures because I am fully aware of my own capacity for wishful thinking, confirmation bias and self-delusion.
- Ray B, Stockport

Drinking organic milk does not produce mucus and allergies - as long as it is organic monkey milk.
- Spikey, Glastonbury



Labels: ,

 

 

1 Comments View blog reactions


About Me

The Quackometer has been developed by Andy Lewis. If you wish to get in contact then please read the FAQ and then email me. Details in the About section.

Subscribe

Get email alerts when the blog is updated.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Tools

Get the QuackSafeTM Surfing 4 in 1 Toolbar. Access the quackometer from any web page.

 

Subscribe to the Quackometer Blog by Email