{"id":917,"date":"2009-03-23T18:30:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-23T17:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/wpblog\/2009\/03\/will-the-government-bail-out-ofquack.html"},"modified":"2009-03-23T18:30:00","modified_gmt":"2009-03-23T17:30:00","slug":"will-government-bail-out-ofquack","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/2009\/03\/will-government-bail-out-ofquack.html","title":{"rendered":"Will the Government Bail Out Ofquack?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>It does not take a lot of analysis to realise that the newly formed Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council is going to be in a desperate financial state quite soon. The CNHC, or Ofquack to its friends, was launched this year <\/a>after being set up by Prince Charles’ charity, the Foundation for Integrated Health, backed by funding of about \u00a3900,000 from the Department of Health.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Ofquack is the “national voluntary regulator for complementary healthcare practitioners in the UK”. It was conceived to be a single place that the public could go to find out if their quack of choice was ‘legit’. The whole project has been a farce with most alternative medicine trades refusing to play ball. Why should a quack subject themselves to any sort of regulation voluntarily when they have existing bodies that pretend to do the job already and will never, ever actually intervene in their work? <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

The Ofquack project was really dependent on the homeopaths to succeed. Homeopaths represent the largest group of alternative medicine cranks in the UK and if the various homeopathic factions had played ball, the CNHC could have been secure with subscriptions from many thousands of homeopaths. But the homeopaths dug their heels in, refused to relinquish any of their independence and squabbled amongst each other as what to do on their own. The Society of Homeopaths, I am sure, want to be seen as the sole regulator of their profession and have dropped their membership fees this year in an attempt to mop up the dregs that have joined smaller ‘regulators’, such as the Alliance of Registered Homeopaths. This refusal to take part in Ofquack has grassroots support amongst the trade: the Society are a trustworthy ‘regulator’ for them in that they will not uphold their own code of practice <\/a>when their members make irrational and dangerous claims to be able to treat disease, even AIDS. This story has been repeated on smaller scales with other quack bodies.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
So, the government funding to the Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council has been burnt over several years in setting up the body. There cannot be a great deal left. Since launch in January, Ofquack will have been taking subscriptions from newly signed\u00a0 up members \u2013 and it is this income that it needs to survive.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
What costs will Ofquack have? From their web site<\/a>, it would appear that the organisation needs to support the activities of nine board members, a dozen committee members and three office administrators. Now, most of these people will not receive salaries. Undoubtedly, the office staff receive a salary (fairly modest, I would guess) and the senior board staff may do too. Let\u2019s do some back of the envelope calculations and generously suggest that there are two senior full time equivalent salaries to pay and three more junior office staff \u2013 I suggest 2 x \u00a350,000 plus 3 x \u00a320,000. Now, as a rule of thumb, total costs for staff can be up to three times salaries when you take into account national insurance, benefit and pension payments, office space, heating, lighting, computing equipment and expenses. Let\u2019s keep numbers down and say total costs are likely to be twice base salary and this gives us an estimated\u00a0 figure of \u00a3320,000 per year. Real costs may well be higher as I have not taken into account any of the costs of administering the register, including hosting costs, design, documentation, legal advice (the lawyers have had some work<\/a>) and publicity. <\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
What income can Ofquack expect this year? Their target<\/a> was for 10,000 registered members. The registration fee is between \u00a330 and \u00a345 and an application fee of \u00a315 is payable. So, let\u2019s say average first year income per registrant is \u00a350, then Ofquack could expect an income of \u00a3500,000, which looks like the sort of income required to self-finance the body.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
Three months into the year and how are the CNHC doing? Until a few days ago, it was possible to use the Ofquack web site to list all registered members (including, rather naughtily, all addresses and telephone numbers, in breach of their own data protection policy). This list suggested that there were just over 150 members. This is staggeringly low, given the publicity they have had. I suggested a few weeks ago, that they would be lucky to make 1000 registrations this year. I may even have to revise my own pessimistic estimates sharply downwards. At the moment, the problem for Ofquack is that they can only take registrations from massage therapists and nutritional therapists. And as I have said before<\/a>, at least for the nutritionists, I cannot see what joining such a body would do for them when they have such a cosy membership body already that lets them take kick backs on the vitamin pill sales they make and allows them to use dodgy diagnostic tests in order to help make the pill sales.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
So, their income so far from membership is in the range of \u00a37,500 against projected costs of greater than \u00a3300,000. This is known in the start up trade as \u2018burning cash\u2019.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
How will the money be made up? Of course, there are still nine more months to register members. However, one would expect a sudden surge with all the publicity followed by a sharp decline. Why would a nutritionist join later when they have had the chance to join now? What will change? Secondly, the CNHC hope to be able to get new \u2018disciplines\u2019 on board and sign up new types of registrant, such as reiki practitioners and cranial therapists (both bonkers forms of quackery). It would be unlikely that these therapists would rush to Ofquack for several reasons: firstly, most sorts of practitioners were fairly hostile to Ofquack and held deep suspicious about it; secondly, the economic climate may well be commercially testing these practitioners as the worried well concentrate on balancing their check books rather than their chakras; and thirdly, why would any of them risk an external\u00a0 and voluntary regulator governing what they do in the first place? I cannot see how Ofquack can be self-funding from registration fees given the current rate of applications.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
Could Ofquack increase its fees? It would have to do so substantially. Quacks, like homeopaths already pay their membership bodies hundreds of pounds per year. Pressure was put on the newly forming Ofquack to keep their fees as low as possible so as not to threaten the income to membership bodies. Without membership of the CNHC being compulsory, it is difficult to see how fees could be anything more than nominal. Even at the current small rate, it is not making registration desirable.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
Prince Charles could step in. There must be pressure here as Ofquack is his baby. But would he really throw hundreds of thousands from his Princes Trust to save a dead duck? He would make an even bigger fool of himself. And additionally, cash from his businesses such as Duchy Originals<\/a> is already suffering<\/a> due to the economic slump as consumers realise their organic needs might not be quite so high.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
Sooner or later, the CNHC will be attempting to take membership fees knowing that it will run out of cash and be unable to supply a service without a miracle cure being forthcoming. It would appear to be absurd that the Department of Health would continue to bung cash down this hole when it is quite clear the whole thing is a horribly misconceived adventure that was never going to work. When the bank is trying to bail out banks and small businesses, would the government really throw cash at this failing enterprise when the only person that really wanted it was Prince Charles? <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It does not take a lot of analysis to realise that the newly formed Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council is going to be in a […]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[45,47,110,188],"class_list":["post-917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ofquack","tag-cnhc","tag-complementary-and-natural-healthcare-council","tag-natural-healthcare-council","tag-ofquack"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=917"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/917\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.quackometer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}