Getting in Contact

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Leaving Comments

Please feel free to leave comments on any of the blog entries, or general comments here. I accept comments from all, critical or supportive.

I will only delete comments if they are offensive or not in the good spirit of debate, or are so far of topic that it can only be seen as trolling.

If you wish to post as Anonymous then please try not to do the following four things that almost all anonymous posters do:
  • write about something unconnected with my article
  • offer an anecdote about your own personal struggle with toxins and how homeopathy cured your disease that the doctors had given up on
  • accuse me of being ignorant
  • show your own ignorance by saying something profoundly daft.

Please also read the FAQ first too.

Emailing me

You can email me at:


5 Comments:

Anonymous liz bredberg said...

Great idea, only I fed the duck two of the most fraudulent websites I know for support for learning disabilities and the duck went for them hook line and sinker (mixing metaphors).

System may as yet need some tweaking.

November 5, 2007 3:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I enjoyed the site. I must confess however that after being a very skeptical consumer I have fallen for acupunture. It simply works for my lower back pain...it is totally anecdotal, and I still don't buy into the whole "chi" redirected energy thing. However I can't deny the very real pain, and muscle relaxation effect that it has on me. So am I still allowed to poopoo other alternative remedies? chiropractic, homeopathic, ect.? It is very disturbing, as my natural tendency is to dismiss them all as rubbish.

November 6, 2007 11:28 AM  
OpenID hpietkiewicz said...

You might find this government funded report on CAM usage by cancer suffers an interesting contribution to the debate about how far CAM should be required to submit to the same evidential criteria as allopathic medicine.

http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Policyandguidance/Researchanddevelopment/A-Z/NationalNHSRDfunding/DH_4032132

If you haven't the time to read it all. the last paragraph of the section entitled "Description of the Literature" makes the argument, though why we have to waste £150,000 of public money to reach such an obvious conclusion still escapes me.
Regards
Henry

January 7, 2008 8:11 AM  
Blogger Svetlana said...

Today is 21 February 2008.
Quackometer works again!!!

Dear LeCanard... Oh, no!!! :)
Dear Phoenix!!!

Dear Andy Lewis,
I congratulate you with second birth of your brilliant blog!
I wish your blog to become more better (if it still possible :))
And I wish you Happiness and Health!
Keep it up!

Good Luck! :)

February 21, 2008 8:53 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With the link to the BNP site, can you post a NSFW (not safe for work) warning. Where I work I can get into trouble for looking at sites like this.

November 20, 2008 11:26 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

About Me

The Quackometer has been developed by Andy Lewis. If you wish to get in contact then please read the FAQ and then email me. Details in the About section.

Tools

Get the QuackSafeTM Surfing 4 in 1 Toolbar. Access the quackometer from any web page.

 

Subscribe to the Quackometer Blog by Email

Find out more

Visit the Quackometer Amazon Store. Buy books there and help support the quackometer

News

The quackometer is currently undergoing redevelopment after a move to new servers.

In the meantime, the quackometer engine is not available.

Powered by Positive