More Threats to the Quackometer

Mr Duck, you really need to change your ISP.

The lawyer’s letter says that google has banned the material from appearing in the ROI is true! If you search ‘quackometer dr obi’ in google.ie, your 12 October piece is about 7 links down but it you click the hyperlink to your September piece, you get a ‘page cannot be found’ message. Disgraceful.
kmann

Apologies for bad grammer & typing in the above.
kmann

Solidarity, brother. This Alt-Med bullying is getting ridiculous – Walker v Colquhoun, SoH v Quackometer, Obi v Quackometer and Holford v Everybody…

Joseph Chikelue Obi really is not an nice chap at all. Fancy him bandying a word like ‘ethical’ around.

I’d second Skeptico
leave your ISP.
Bullies need to be stood up to and have daylight shone on their nasty activities. Your ISP is spineless.

I totally support you!

All the bloggers writing about this should make sure they link to each others sites as well as Quackometer to try and boost each others google rankings. With any luck this action will backfire spectacularly and the whole first page of a google search of Joseph Chikelue Obi will consist of blog entries.

I’ll put up mirrors of the pages soonest. I also suggest improving Joseph Chikelue Obi‘s google profile by linking Joseph Chikelue Obi‘s name to newspaper articles about Joseph Chikelue Obi‘s various enterprises and activities.

I’ve added it as well.

Ms Tanja Suessenbach is just a nice bright kid straight out of uni, trying to make a living by operating a website/one person business out of her living room.

She is as much a victim of friend Obi as you and so many other people are.
I doubt if she will be able to deal with the web-storm that the letter she signed and sent to your ISP is bringing.

A bit of Internet digging suggests that the journalist who wrote about the non-existent “RCAM” for the Irish Independent a couple of years back, one Tom Lyons, now writes for the Sunday Times.

I expect you already have some national media types sniffing around this, LCN – any chance Nick Cohen at the Observer would fancy a go at “legal bluster and craven ISPs protect fraudsters from exposure”? – but if not, I wonder whether the ex-Irish Indy man would be interested in a follow-up? Looks like a hell of a story to me.

My first press interview contact was today. And I think a few more will not hurt. The internet freedom thing is the main thing to discuss.

Have been unearthing some bizarre things tonight on Obi. Need to sleep on it…

Pity they can’t bring themselves to say exactly what is defamatory about any of the content. Could it be because the content is all true?
Do we have a word to describe people who make false claims? Beginning with “L”?
And shame on Google – a bunch of money grubbers with a complete disregard for truth and freedom.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4647398.stm

Ms Tanja Suessenbach is just a nice bright kid straight out of uni, trying to make a living by operating a website/one person business.

Yes. I think we might have some sympathy for her if she has been duped by Mr Obi – which is quite likely.

pages mirrored

http://www.wanderingprimate.com/2008/01/quakometer-speaks.html

Keep up the great work

I’m not sure whether Obi Wan’s crude attempts to suppress open debate are really linked to other recent CAM actions (Colquhoun etc); he just seems like a cheap crook to me, although I guess he could be delusional as well. Either way, this sort of thing needs to be stopped. I will be publicising your story (in the UniVite newsletter); but is there anything else we can do to help?
paul c

“My first press interview contact was today. And I think a few more will not hurt. The internet freedom thing is the main thing to discuss.”.

I think it is wider than that, in the sense that it is another example of “legal chill” used to suppress truths which con-men and liars find inconvenient. Of course British public life has a long and rather abject tradition of this, personified in recent years by the late Robert Maxwell.

The particular problem with the internet is that the ISPs take this business-based (not to say craven) view that “any objection to a page / blog is potentially problematic, no matter how ridiculous the objection, so we’ll just take the page down” – laughable in this case as the plaintiff did not have a shred of credibility, as a quick Google reveals.

At least with David Colquhoun and UCL there was an organisation / entity behind the server with some kind of moral compass, even it took a lot of public humiliation to get them to remember it.

With the ISPs, which are in business strictly to make money, it is hard to know what one can do. But “name and shame” is a start. So perhaps you are right about the line to use – but I still think “Legal filibuster and craven ISPs protect con-artists and crooks from exposure” makes a good “hook”.

Thanks Paul and all,

but is there anything else we can do to help?

I think all we need do now is sit back and wait for the punchline.

Actually, one thing that would be good is if all reposters would include a few links to other posters. Neurologica has the most google juice, so that is a good place to start.

This is truly scary.
I’ve posted something in support on my own (mainly unread) blog, and provided a few links.
I second the suggestions to give up Netcetera, but the bigger issue is this prick, Obi Wan.
Quackometer, I support you wholeheartedly!

I’ve posted as well.

Googling;

Professor Dr. Joseph Chikelue Obi (5/10)
Dr. Joseph Chikelue Obi (4/10)
Joseph Chikelue Obi (7/10)

is getting more duckophilic links on the first page, though with the variations shown above in their proportion of that page.