Homeopath Finds a Cure for Ebola: Violin Music

Is this Chappell tosser still a member of the SOH? If so, is this the opening to show the PSA why they made such a stupid mistake in accrediting the homeopathetics? And show the SOH up for what it really is i.e. an apologetic smokescreen for absolute nonsense.

Viola music works better.
At least, it sounds similar to the sound the name ebola makes.
And as we all know – ‘similia similibus’.

It’s time to start jailing some of these people now. They’ve done it with the bogus ‘bomb detector’ crooks. What’s the difference? Maybe because the bomb detector people were actual scam artists,but this man is mentally ill and believes this stuff? If you follow the links, he seems to be claiming to cure genocide. This is where Homeopathy becomes murderous.

I can cure genocide by playing the spoons.
Just look at Rotherham and environs.
NO genocide for months there.

I’d like to know diseases are cured by listening to AC/DC. Also, what does listening to bassoon music cure?

This tool is prima facie evidence of the depletion of the gene pool. Sad.

In the light of this report, I have written to my M.P. asking him to pursue a complaint with the Department of Health over the P.S.A. accreditation of the Society of Homeopaths. I urge all of you to do the same.

I’d like to see him play a gig in Liberia

I’d often wondered why violinists are immortal.

Violin music does not cure polio, though. Ask Itzhak Perlman.

I wonder if Peter Chappell and any other homeopaths would care to go to Africa, expose themselves to Ebola, HIV, TB etc. and then test their claim that music will cure them. Just asking?

strange that as soon as an outbreak of something nasty occurs, homeopaths suddenly have a ‘cure’ for it

I’ll just leave this, in case anyone feels like a satirical dig: http://www.change.org/p/dr-daniel-kertesz-who-end-the-suffering-of-the-ebola-crisis-test-and-distribute-homeopathy-as-quickly-as-possible-to-contain-the-outbreaks

More lies from Big Quacka I’m afraid.
Far from advocating Homeopathy, as Big Quacka claims, the WHO warns against it.
These liars and gullibles HAVE to be stopped now.

I just read the stuff that Guy Chapman’s link referred to in more detail.
To be more precise,I should say that the Homeopath idiot doesn’t claim that the WHO supports Homeopathy, but he phrases his opinion in such a way that one could assume that they do. In other words, he says that the WHO agrees that Homeopathy is on the rise around the world, and leaves the viewer to come to the conclusion that the WHO feels there is some merit to this.Which of course isn’t the same thing at all. The homeopath even provides a link to a WHO report, with the implication being that it will back up Homeopathy, probably knowing full well that very few people will click on it and find the organisation’s real views on this nonsense.

Conditions that can be cured by listening to AC/DC? Albinism maybe?

The bassoon is the cure for nothing except tedium defecit.

Don’t know if people saw the news item about the bogus doctor on Harley Street who claimed to be able to cure cancer. As he left Court, he was collared by a reporter who asked if he’d ever studied Medicine.
His priceless reply- ‘Well no, not Medical Medicine’.

Words fail me!

Whatever next?

Haha. I’m a violinist, so does that mean I will never get Ebola??

A friend informs me that there’s a Botox clinic in Glasgow which has a sign outside saying ‘Inspired By Medicine’.

I just got a message saying ‘You are posting comments too quickly. Slow down’.

“There is not the slightest reason to suppose this might work.” – I couldn’t disagree more! I don’t know about a cure, but listening to this as a preventive measure works if: a) you listen to it constantly while b) avoiding all contact with other people while doing so. Very adventurous people can even try a few hiatuses, as long as they stay away from other people. If you can’t get hold of one of his MP3 files and you want to avoid Ebola it is absolutely necessary you stay away from other people.

Peter Chappell defends himself

http://www.peterchappell.com/2014_10_01_archive.html?m=1

Hubris knows no bounds.

Dear Mr Barrie,
Yes, India many people are sick and ill with many diseases. It is not because they use Homeopathy. It is because of their life style. Though conventional medicines test protocol is flawless, though efficacy of medicines is beyond doubt, ramifications of the side effects are too much to bear. Coming to the Homeopathy, in India Homeopaths trained like medical doctors. They don’t practice anything what you have mentioned in your articles.
Good men preach about the GOD. Fake cheating Godmen too talk about the GOD and gain money and power. Because of Goodmen and Fake Godmen preach, you can’t consider them as equal.
In many countries, homeopaths are not properly trained. Those who can’t understand what chemical bonding is, talk about how to choose elements from the periodic table for various illnesses. Quacks exists in western countries in many fields. They adulterate Homeopathy to Yoga and derive new things for their survival.
Don’t you think conventional medicine is not exceptional as far as quacks are concerned. Some doctors have got forged qualifications. Do you blame only those cheats or complete medical science?
If you think you know science, no problem. But if you think no one else has knowledge of science, do what you are doing. What I mean is, expose quacks.. but don’t generalize things. i hope you understand.
yours sincerely
Dr.Narasimha
Aerospace Engineer

What a sense of humor Sir..By the way which mental asylum you are from? What Narasimha has written and what the fuck you are talking.

Wow! Andy… You have got so much knowledge about aerospace engineering.. When I was studying Mechanical engineering, whenever I tell that I am pursuing Mechanical engineering, illiterate people like you, Andy, used to say “wow.. can you repair my car?”.. You are one such idiot, Andy..

Interesting observation about so called medical scientists…They try to explain how something (which is time tested) works.. If they can’t (due to limitations), they say “that something is quackery”. If they can, there will be a new patent and create market worth billions of dollars.
A noble lady referred 700 years old literature and treated Malaria with some recipe made from wormwood and got noble prize. Now you (so called medical scientists) can explain how it works.. But you lack common sense and do not think how 700 years ago people could realize the medicinal effect of that bark. Cherry pick quacks (as you love quacks and quackery) and compare them with time tested medicines that have saved your ancestors from diseases.
Most of the times, only people without basic knowledge of complementary medicine (once upon a time, those were only medicines available to the mankind) criticize harshly complementary therapies. I don’t know whether to call critics of quackery as quacks or???

As far as I can discern from your half-witted illiterate rubbish, some unnamed lady got some kind of noble prize for using some made-up medicine that’s 700 years old, and was so effective back then that people decided to stop using it. Have I got that right?

Barrie, I think you are unidirectional. Blogging your own shit.. but don’t have common sense to search for nobel prize winners list and their work. Here is the link.. By the way, dear Barrie, which flat earth society do you belong to? You are no way different from the quacks you have mentioned in your post.
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-china-blog-34451386

You are right Barrie.. Andy is stupid.. I have also said the same…

Well at least your lame and aggressive attempts at ‘humour’ are typical of your kind.

Well…. nice try.
But not REALLY the same thing though, is it.

May be that MP3 guy is humorous and witty. You were too aggressive at his fun making acts and aggressively criticizing time tested medicines. Quacks, greedy, bad people are every where. Anyway, spending life thinking about quacks and quackery.. What a tasteless, waste of life.. Barrie.. I pity you..

Indian homeopaths might think they are trained like real doctors, but they are not. Real doctors do not learn the mumble-jumbo of the similimum, homeopathic case takin, constitutional types and so on. Real doctors’ education is grounded in objective reality. Above all, real doctors learn the importance of science. When a treatment is found not to work, it is discarded mercilessly. I cannot find a single example of a homeopathic remedy that has been removed from the repertories, ever. Think about that for a moment. Is it really the case that homeopathy is entirely immune from human error?

Dear Barrie, you are proving my statements again and again.
You have called MP3 guy as a quack. I too have called him as a quack.
You were very aggressive and started criticizing whole homeopathy. I strongly feel that no fake medicine will survive for more than 200 years. Of course, I believe in science and science based medicine and strong advocate of conventional medications within the family.
I don’t know your credentials.. but I am aware of my credentials and successes in my field of engineering. You are calling me as a quack.. Just I didn’t praise you..
Now here is my comment.. Wow! Barrie.. what an article.. You found a quack and popularized them by filling a long page about him on your blog… What a work! Fantastic it is.. Keep it up, Sir….

Sir, your comment is very sensible, reasonable and logical too. Here I am not advocating Homeopathy. MP3 guy is a quack. He should be jailed. Like that many cheaters are there in the world. Why we need to tell Homeopathy is a quackery. i strongly believe that if it is, it will lose its existence on its own. No fakes survived long enough in the human history.
Coming to Homeopathy, though I didn’t study their complete literature, it is a simple philosophy based on like cures like. Volunteer provers take a substance and tell their symptoms. Same substance will be given as the remedy If any “diseased” experience similar symptoms. Means, homeopath prescribe remedies based on the symptoms and totality of the symptoms. Not with the name of the disease as per conventional medicine. Therefore, clinical trials similar to conventional medicines are not possible.
I would honestly expect answer for the following question.
In your reply, you have mentioned that “medicines are removed mercilessly, if they don’t work”. What exactly do you mean by that Sir?
My friend went to a specialist doctor in USA for “pain, pins and needle sensations” in the fingers. He was given ENDEP. Later on he developed new symptoms. Then medications increased in number. It went on from ENDEP to anti-inflammatory, TNF inhibitors.. what not.. List is overwhelmingly long to write. Finally my friend became immobile, blind (with nystagmus) and liver got completely damaged. Means, all those medicines used by him were mercilessly removed from the market??????
What do you expect homeopaths to do? If one remedy doesn’t work for a patient, should they remove it from the repertory or materia medica? Kindly answer.

Since homeopathy is a religion, not a science, it can be criticised as such, i.e. in terms of its illogic or lies, not in terms of its non-existent ‘science’.
Your oft-touted engineering background is therefore no more important than my artistic one in terms of the ability to construct, or understand, a sound critical argument.
You say that you deeply believe that no quack medicine could last 200 years.
I think I’m correct in saying that Hahnemann first published his nonsense in 1810. By my reckoning, that’s 206 years ago.
So -you’re left with two options.
1. Homeopathy, despite being a quack ‘medicine’, has broken your 200 year barrier and has indeed lasted, and made fools of people.
2. Homeopathy is NOT a quack medicine, and yet, even after 206 years, you and other believers can’t, or won’t, provide evidence of why and how.
Neither position, it seems to me, provides you with very great comfort.

Dear Barrie, You have got very funnily narrow way of interpreting the information.
Let me write you few important things.
* I am not an advocate of the Homeopathy. I neither useI them nor recommend them.
* for my family members, I use conventional and science based medicine.
* MP3 guy is a quack. I ignore such people. You make them famous through your blog.
* So far I am with the hope that any quackery will not last longer. But you redefined Quackery as religion. Religion related adverse effects are increasing day by day. No religion died down so far. All evils growing stronger with each passing day.
* I normally leave it to the time. Who we are to think that people around us are less intelligent and easily fooled by quacks.

Finally I want to ask you one thing. Do you have any Ebola patient who has gone to that quack and got affected adversely? I am sure that no one.. Because, people with Ebola symptoms run to the emergency. and get the required medical help. Just you are popularizing the quack and quackery.

in my previous email 200 years is referring to Homeopathy. You calculated it as 206 years.
What I meant to say was, something survived 200 years. Means, people must be getting benefited with that Homeopathy. I don’t mean that 200 years is a bench mark.

Very strange thing is, I accepted everything about the quackery. Only thing I differ from you is, criticizing something as quackery. We should ignore such people because modesty, tolerance is important. In stead of ignoring quacks, you are undoubtedly, glorifying them.

I give up, Mr Barrie… I have got better things to do..
Good luck with your quackometer.

Why we need to tell Homeopathy is a quackery. i strongly believe that if it is, it will lose its existence on its own. No fakes survived long enough in the human history.

That is simply not true. Bloodletting and purging were used for over two millennia despite the fact that they did more harm than good. There are also dozens of mutually contradictory religions, by your argument they should all (or perhaps all but one) have shut down by now.

Your error is to assume that choices are being made solely base don evidence and empirical fact. They aren’t. Of course if choices were made solely on that basis then there would be no homeopathy, acupuncture, reiki, crystal or faith “healing” – but these practices persist because they are essentially religious, not medical.

Persistence into the 21st Century is entirely possible even for outright delusional nonsense like homeopathy. Belief spreads on its own, all it requires is for believers to infect new believers. The beliefs do not have to have any objective merit whatsoever.