Burzynski Supporting Charity Loses Funding

Yes to Life promotes superstitious, unproven, pseudoscientific cancer treatments. It should not be funded.

Discussing the problems posed by unconventional clinics, such as the Burzynski Clinic in Texas, has been a frustrating business. Leaving aside the direct threats from the clinic, it appears that such ventures attract followers with a religious zeal about what they do. It also is clear that the media cannot discuss the issue without framing it around a dying child with all the distortions that is bound to create.

So, first off, it was great to see Dr Christian Jessen raise the issue in the London Evening Standard.

But more importantly, there is news that, after a swift campaign, one Burzynski supporting charity will not be receiving funds from benefit concerts anymore.

Yes to Life is a well meaning but deeply confused charity that tries to encourage people with cancer to take ‘alternative’ options. By this, I mean that it puts people in touch with techniques and practitioners who use unproven, disproven, superstitious and pseudoscientific forms of cancer treatment. In short, it peddles false hope.

The charity lists every quack cancer therapy you can name, inlcuding Laetrile, Vitamin C, Gerson, Issels and Mistletoe. Not only does it list these therapies but lists practitioners both in the UK and overseas that are prepared to take your money and provide treatments outside of the mainstream. The site lists the great and the good of alternative medicine in the UK, including Dr Peter Fisher, Dr Wendy Denning, Professor George Lewith and Dr Jean Munro.

We see lesser known doctors, such as Dr Andrew Young-Snell in Brighton, offer Ozone therapy, Vitamin C tablets, Hyperthermia treatment and nutritional therapy, for £170 per hour.

Of course, Yes to Life lists Dr Burzynski of Houston and his Antineoplaston Therapy. We are told this therapy can “reprogram cancerous cells to behave like normal cells.”

Yes to Life has many high profile supporters that promote this very peculiar practice including Barbara Flynn, Maureen Lipman and Jerry Hall. Medical supporters include many previously associated with Prince Charles’ defunct quack charity, the Foundation for Integrated Health, including Dr Rosy Daniel, Boo Armstrong and head of the NHS Alliance, Dr Michael ‘Dickie Bow’ Dixon.

And outside of the medical world, let us not forget ‘Professor’ Jayney Goddard, President of the Complementary Medical Association and Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.

So, it concerned a number of people to see a charity night being put on in April at the Bloomsbury theatre in London in aid of this organisation.  The gig was to be given by everyone’s favourite marijuanna smuggler and convicted criminal, Mr Howard Marks. Now, by all accounts, Mr Marks is a very nice man, and I am not sure he was aware that he was getting into bed with such disreputable folk.

The Bloomsbury probably did not know too. The theatre is part of University College London with its own medical school. The Bloomsbury has been hosting great sceptical events, including Robin Ince’s Nine Lessons, and has seen Brian Cox, Richard Dawkins, Ben Goldacre and Simon Singh perform there. There was a strong feeling that this was not right.

And so, starting with Susan Bewley of Healthwatch, a number of people wrote to the theatre and the organisation, The Charity Fundraiser, to highlight their concerns. Prominent oncologists from UCL joined with well known science writers and scientists to ask if the event could be reconsidered. And it is to the great credit of Jeremy Banks and the director of the theatre, Peter Cadley, that they engaged with the problem and quickly found a resolution.

So, the good news is that the event will still be going ahead – and I do understand Howard Marks can be very entertaining – but all funds raised will be going to the Beyond Food Foundation, a charity that helps the homeless find meaningful employment. I hope you can go and enjoy the evening.

I doubt this would have been possible without the wave of awareness that has been generated on twitter and blogs since last November when Peter Kay was raising funds for Burzynski’s treatments and the Observer was running uncritical articles on his methods.

It maybe one small piece of the huge problem of misleading cancer treatments, but hopefully there is a slightly smaller chance that desperately ill people will be misinformed and feel they need to spend the last of their money on snake oil.

Related posts:

1. Burzynski in Court: Patient treated like a ‘Cash Machine’ Dr Stanislaw Burzynski has some problems. His forthcoming hearing with the Texas Medical Board has been widely publicised.  It would now appear that he has more immediate concerns. According to...
2. The False Hope of the Burzynski Clinic Yesterday’s Observer contained a full page, heart breaking story of a 4-year old girl, Billie Bainbridge, who has a inoperable and rare form of brain cancer, Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine...
3. The Burzynski Clinic Threatens 17 Year Old Blogger I have been hinting that Burzynski has been threatening other prominent UK bloggers. Well, that blogger has now gone public. Rhys Morgan Rhys Morgan is a 17 year old schoolboy...
4. Burzynski Clinic Issues a Statement What to make of the press release issued by the Burzynski Clinic? Well, the good news is that Marc Stephens, the PR man who threatened my family, has had his...
5. The Burzynski Clinic Threatens My Family. Tonight, the entertainer Peter Kay will be performing the first of two special sell-out gigs in Blackpool to raise funds for a very poorly four-year old girl with brain cancer....

Tags: burzynski